Health Consumer Powerhouse

Rue Fossé aux Loups boite 2, 1000 Bruxelles, phone +32 2 218 7393
 
 
 
 

Will the EU finally deliver – or make us disappointed once again?

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Last Updated (June 24, 2010) Written by Administrator June 24, 2010

The European Union has hardly gained reputation for action that significantly simplifies the life of common citizens. There are no doubt such measures but more often they disappear behind the media hype of bureaucratic details and interventions. During the autumn of 2010 there will be a number of opportunities for the EU to prove that added value can be delivered in the field of European healthcare.

A growing number of member states cut down on public spending to handle the effects from the financial crisis. In practice there will be an impact on healthcare budgets - not immediately, but in the next few years. Can the EU contribute to support the transformation of healthcare into more user-friendly functions, allowing for a deeper personal involvement (which can save money, as responsibilities and value awareness increases)?

"McHip"

There are issues for the EU present agenda which - potentially - could move in this direction. I think of patient mobility, which over time will affect the way you look on treatment costs. As the cross-border care directive will gradually implement there will be a debate about medical travelling as a way to save money and improve outcomes; transparency of treatment costs will show that if you send patients abroad to other EU members you might get three hip replacements for the cost of one such operation in the country of residence. Think of how a "McHip Index" would impact! To build such a process credible and reliable you will have to allow people to learn about where to find good healthcare, avoid poor quality and how to compare the performance. Driving such a transparency process would be a valuable EU contribution to creating alternative strategies to the traditional cost squeeze in healthcare.

"Democratic compliance"

Allowing people to have the full picture also in another area - consumer information about prescribed medicines - could have similar effects. You might be surprised? Is not the established truth that better informed patients ask for more expensive medicines? Can we afford such a perspective? Yes, we can - and should!

Under-informed patients are used to somebody else paying the bill and often do not follow the doctors prescription, leading to huge amounts of medicines left in cupboards or even causing harm. This is not surprising, as understanding is a requisite for "democratic compliance". But still there is a blatant lack of reliable medicine information sources for the demanding consumer. Here there is a risk the EU will legislate to prevent consumer access to the full picture. The super-aim of preventing pharmaceutical companies to market their products still paralyses policy; instead of allowing any kind of "pull" information on the Internet to empower patients there will probably be maintained censorship. Still patients cannot be trusted to know of side effects and the view of fellow users...

Organ donations

For Europeans in the need of transplantation the new organ donation framework will save lives. Again, transparency will be a key driver for improvement, telling stakeholders how unequal the chances are distributed to survive or recover thanks to organ transplantations. This does not have to be a matter of money, rather of cultural and political attitudes. A joint EU policy will drive development.

Join our "open consultation"!

These are just a few of the health-related topics. During this spring, Health Consumer Powerhouse has run an "open consultation" on how consumers use the emerging websites of hospital performance comparisons, with a record participation around the EU. After summer we will present a report suggesting improvements to increase the impact on patient choice. We are right now opening a second round of input on our preliminary findings (this time not only for care consumers).

Please feel free to visit our blog to provide your views - regardless in what capacity you take an interest!

In the field of consumer information on medicines we will present alternatives to censorship, promoting user empowerment. Here as well we have asked for patient experience - and got more than 1 000 answers! Medicines information is a topic that engages. How will EU ever become competitive if being stuck to the debate of yesterday when the future - with a wide range of Internet options - calls for individual involvement, not exclusion?

My initial question remains to be answered. Will the next EU presidencies, the new Commission and the European Parliament contribute - or block the road?

Johan Hjertqvist


Directive on "Organ Transplantation" adopted by EP

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Last Updated (May 20, 2010) Written by Administrator May 20, 2010

The European Parliament today adopted, with an overwhelming majority, the Report by Miroslav Mikolášik MEP on the standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation. "This is an important milestone in the history and success of transplantations. I welcome the smooth adoption of the Directive and Action Plan. By setting high standards for quality and safety of the transplantation process, we can help thousands of patients throughout the EU", said Rapporteur Miroslav Mikolášik. More...

 

Canada Health Consumer Index 2010

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Last Updated (May 17, 2010) Written by Administrator May 17, 2010

The Canadian Frontier Centre for Public Policy and the Health Consumer Powerhouse released the third annual Canada Health Consumer Index (CHCI). The Index evaluates the consumer-friendliness of Canada's healthcare system. It compares Canada to 33 European countries by assessing the extent to which each national healthcare system meets the needs of healthcare users. 

 

In the study, analysts from the Frontier Centre and the Health Consumer Powerhouse compare the 34 national healthcare systems across five different "sub-disciplines:" Patient Rights and Access to Information, Wait Times, Patient Outcomes, Range and Reach of Services and Access to Pharmaceuticals.

 

The report shows that despite high levels of government spending, healthcare in Canada is markedly less responsive to consumers' needs than most European countries. Ben Eisen, a co-author of the study, says: "Canadians still face excessively long waiting periods for care. Canada spends as much money as the top performers on healthcare like the Netherlands and Germany, but we haven't been able to match their levels of efficiency. By looking at our own areas of relative weakness and examining European best practices, we can better understand where improvement is most needed and what sorts of reforms are likely to bring about measurable progress." 

May 10, 2010

echi-2010Download index
   

PatientView alerts and updates

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Last Updated (April 15, 2010) Written by Administrator April 08, 2010

PatientView for patients' views

 

Invitation to European-based patient groups/patients to participate in an online survey on patient information

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which the healthcare consumers in the different countries of Europe are able to make key choices about hospitals and medicines in 2010.

Health Consumer Powerhouse (HCP) is asking health campaigners across Europe to offer their opinions to help it compile the latest HCP research publication, TO CHOOSE OR NOT TO CHOOSE: CONSUMER INFORMATION ON HOSPITALS IN EUROPE. TO CHOOSE OR NOT TO CHOOSE will look at how successfully patients in Europe in 2010 make key healthcare choices by using the information available in their countries. If you would like to contribute your views on the level of choice experienced by your country's patients, you will find a live link below to HCP's online questionnaire. The questionnaire is short-only 10 questions-and should take no more than about 5-10 minutes of your time to complete, depending on how much you wish to comment. The survey is being carried on a specialist survey website, so allowing all responses to be completely ANONYMOUS (unless you wish otherwise). The survey's closing date is Monday May 31st 2010 (but HCP would welcome your opinions before then, in order to draw up some initial trends). To thank you for contributing your opinions to the study, PatientView, the survey administrator, will send you (if you wish) the weblink to HCP's survey report, TO CHOOSE OR NOT TO CHOOSE, upon publication in June 2010. Should you know anyone else who you think might also wish to offer their opinions about patient choice in their country, please feel free to circulate this email to them.


Yours faithfully,
Dr Arne Bjornberg and Johan Hjertqvist,
Health Consumer Powerhouse,
Brussels, Stockholm, and Winnipeg.

You can take part in the survey by pressing your Control button, and clicking your mouse on 2010 HCP online patient choice questionnaire https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/M8GMMYQ

If you have any questions about this HCP survey, please contact the survey administrator:
Louise Oatham, PatientView, Woodhouse Place, Upper Woodhouse, Knighton, Powys, LD7 1NG, UK.
Tel: 0044-(0)1547-520-965
e-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it